- From: Barclay, Daniel <daniel@fgm.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:26:57 -0400
- To: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4AAAA481.50703@fgm.com>
Regarding the OWL 2 Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax specification at http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-syntax-20090611/: In the grammar productions, references to terminals and non-terminals are not hypertext links to the productions defining those terminals and non-terminals (or to the sections containing those productions). (E.g., in section 7, in the DataRange production, the text "Datatype" is not a links to the DataType production in section 5.2 (or to section 5.2 itself).) It would be helpful if they were links, and links between the grammar production seem like prime candidates for linking. (It would also be helpful, though of lower priority, if in the examples the example axioms (e.g., their key/reserved words) were links also. Since making them all regularly-formatted links would presumably clutter things too much (re readability), maybe they could be half-hidden links (that are highlighted only when "moused over").) Daniel -- (Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]
Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 19:26:46 UTC