Re: Comment about AnnotationValue in owl2-syntax of 20091027 from Rouquette, Nicolas F (316A) on 2009-11-29 (public-owl-comments@w3.org from November 2009)

From: Rouquette, Nicolas F (316A) <nicolas.f.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:11:06 -0800
To: "public-owl-comments@w3.org" <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C737426A.E7FB%Nicolas.F.Rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov>

Similarly in 10.2, http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027/#Annotation_Axioms, Figure 23 should have both AnnotationValue and AnnotationSubject shown in italics, i.e., as abstract classes.

- Nicolas.


On 11/28/09 8:48 PM, "Nicolas F Rouquette" <Nicolas.F.Rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

In 10.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027/#Annotations_of_Ontologies.2C_Axioms.2C_and_other_Annotations, Figure 22 should have AnnotationValue shown in italics, i.e., as an abstract superclass of three concrete subclasses: AnnoymousIndividual, IRI and Literal.

- Nicolas.

Received on Sunday, 29 November 2009 08:22:15 UTC