Re: OWL.owl is broken

Oops, sorry. Stupid global replace problem:-) And yes, I have also
realized in the meantime that it should be rdfs:Class, that should be
settled now, too.

Thanks for checking...

Ivan

Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> Ivan,
> 
> 
> Apparently, the file [1] is still broken. It contains:
> 
> <rdfs:rdfs:comment>
>  [...]
> </rdfs:rdfs:comment>
> 
> Moreover, the "system classes" (as Holger call them) are still instances
> of owl:Class, while he subliminally suggested that they should be
> instances of rdfs:Class.
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
> 
> 
> Regards,

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf