RE: [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Re: (continuation on old) comment on OWL2 design

Thank you.
I was of course aware that we had reached an impasse!

> advancement of OWL 2 along the W3C Recommendation Track. (Note that
> according to the W3C Process, Formal Objections are made by
> individuals,
> not organizations.)

Thanks, I was unaware of that - so it falls on me!
Since the objection is essentially about business issues not technical I hope that people will read it as me with a business hat on.

What's the timeline for making text available?


Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 18:30:56 UTC