W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > May 2009

RE: [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Re: (continuation on old) comment on OWL2 design

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:30:18 -0700
To: "'Peter F.Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004401c9d58b$32ddd8e0$98998aa0$@com>

Thank you.
I was of course aware that we had reached an impasse!

> advancement of OWL 2 along the W3C Recommendation Track. (Note that
> according to the W3C Process, Formal Objections are made by
> individuals,
> not organizations.)

Thanks, I was unaware of that - so it falls on me!
Since the objection is essentially about business issues not technical I hope that people will read it as me with a business hat on.

What's the timeline for making text available?

Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 18:30:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:40:21 UTC