Thanks greatly - the new features text is just what we were looking for. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfps@research.bell-labs.com] > Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:10 AM > To: jeremy@topquadrant.com > Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org > Subject: [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Re: nice comment: versioning > > Dear Jeremy, > > Thank you for your comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl- > comments/2009May/0015.html> > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > Thank you for your positive comment on the new versioning setup in OWL > 2. > > We draw your attention to the Primer, New Features and Rationale, and > Quick Reference Guide documents, with editors' drafts available at > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Primer, > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale>, and > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Quick_Reference_Guide>. Each of these > user-friendly documents mention the improvements in OWL 2, but this is > particularly the case in New Features and Rationale. > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to > <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should > suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you > are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. > > Regards, > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working GroupReceived on Friday, 15 May 2009 17:12:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:40:21 UTC