Re: [LC response] To Simon Reinhardt Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy and version IRI

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Dear Simon,
> Thank you for your comment
>  <>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
> The OWL WG was chartered to define OWL 2 and we consider guidance on
> best practice to be outside the charter of the group. We suggest that
> you might find it useful to discuss this in other fora such as

Fair enough. I would consider it as an issue of the working group since you define owl:versionIRI and since you extend on the vocabulary that includes rdfs:isDefinedBy [1] and list it as an annotation property [2]. But the definition of rdfs:isDefinedBy has always been (deliberately) vague so I can understand if you regard it as out of scope - it's your decision after all. :-)

> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.




Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 14:56:05 UTC