Re: [LC Response] To Jacco van Ossenbruggen Re: Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax from Jacco van Ossenbruggen on 2009-08-07 (public-owl-comments@w3.org from August 2009)

From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:35:52 +0200
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <4A7C57E8.2030306@cwi.nl>

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Dear Jacco,
>
> We sent a response
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Mar/0038.html>
> to your comment on our OWL 2 specifications, and in our response we
> asked if you are satisfied. We have not yet heard back from you. If we
> do not hear from you soon, we will proceed on the assumption you are
> satisfied with our response. 
>
> Regards,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group 
>
>   
Dear WG,

Thanks for clarifying the status of  the XML syntax, and for adding the 
view to allow browsing the examples in RDF triple syntax.
I am fully satisfied with your response.

Regards, Jacco

PS: Peter, apologies for the delay of this acknowledgement, your 
response was sent on the day my son was born... :-)

Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 16:36:35 UTC