- From: Daniel Winkler <daniel.winkler@sti2.at>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:53:08 +0200
- To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
> On Dienstag, 4. August 2009, Pascal Hitzler wrote: >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Please Send OWL 2 Implementation Reports (today!) >> Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:46:30 +0000 >> Resent-From: public-owl-dev@w3.org >> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:46:00 -0400 >> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> >> To: public-owl-wg@w3.org, public-owl-dev@w3.org >> >> >> If you've been working on an OWL 2 implementation, please send us e-mail >> about it, to help the Working Group, W3C management, and (eventually) >> the W3C Advisory Committee decide whether OWL 2 is ready to proceed >> along the standards track to becoming a W3C Recommendation. The e-mail >> should go to public-owl-comments@w3.org (which has a public archive >> [1]), and ideally should state the following: >> >> 1. Your name, affiliation, and (optionally) the names of other >> people who helped with the implementation. Daniel Winkler Semantic Technology Institute (STI) Innsbruck Barry Bishop Pascal Hitzler Sebastian Rudolph Markus Krötzsch >> >> 2. The name of your system, a URL for its website (if any), and a >> one-sentence description. ELLY (at the moment the wiki [2] says IRIS, that should be changed to ELLY) http://elly.sourceforge.net/ (will be updated as soon as it is released, currently standard sourceforge.net project website) Data-centric implementation of reasoning and query answering based on translating EL/RL to datalog in a way that preserves assertional entailments. >> >> 3. Which profile(s) it implements (DL, EL, QL, RL, or Full). We >> would appreciate some brief commentary about why you chose those >> profiles, and what sort of implementation techniques you are >> using. EL, RL ELLY is an implementation of an ELP reasoner, therefore the profiles EL and RL are supported. The implementation is based on [3]. >> >> 4. Which semantics you implement (direct or rdf-based), and >> (optionally) why. direct >> >> 5. Do you believe your system currently conforms to the OWL 2 >> Candidate Recommendation? Does it pass all the test cases for >> your profile? If not, which features does it lack and/or which >> test cases does it not yet pass? Do you have plans to make it >> conformant, and make it pass all the test cases? OWL profile support under development. It is planned to be conformant. >> >> 6. Did you implement the "at risk" features, owl:rational and >> rdf:XMLLiteral? If not, do you intend to, or do you think we >> should remove them from OWL 2? TBD >> >> 7. Finally, we'd appreciate your evaluation of whether the OWL 2 >> Candidate Recommendation is ready to proceed along the standards >> track toward being a W3C Recommendation. If not, please be sure >> to tell us what problems you think we need to address. >> >> In some cases, much of this information is already present in our >> implementations table [2], and you can consider this e-mail just a >> request to verify/update that information. To be sure our information >> is correct and up to date, we would appreciate a brief e-mail, even if >> the entry is accurate. >> >> A reply as soon as you read this would be helpful, and then please send >> updates if anything changes. >> >> -- Sandro Hawke, W3C Staff Contact >> OWL Working Group >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Implementations [3] Markus Krötzsch, Sebastian Rudolph, Pascal Hitzler. ELP: Tractable Rules for OWL 2. In Amit Sheth, Steffen Staab, Mike Dean, Massimo Paolucci, Diana Maynard, Timothy Finin, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, eds.: Proceedings of the 7th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-08), pp. 649–664. Springer 2008. Kind regards, Daniel Winkler
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 21:12:48 UTC