- From: Pavithra <pavithra_kenjige@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "\[ontolog-forum\]" <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-owl-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <753826.41155.qm@web38307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Acceptance of words and meanings, is learned by its usage! I believe the term "Class" was derived from the word "classification" to represent abstract data types. To me it makes perfect sense. Even though the implementation / usage varies according the specific programming language. In Anglo Saxon vocabulary the term "issue" means "a child / children" and it is used heavily in Wikipedia. If you look up a person in Wikipedia, you can see that at the personal profile. [ To me, it is confusing! How can a child be an issue? A child is child. ] Just an objective observation! Pavithra Kenjige --- --- On Sun, 4/26/09, Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com> wrote: From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Last Call: OWL 2 and rdf:text primitive datatype To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net> Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, public-owl-comments@w3.org Date: Sunday, April 26, 2009, 4:34 PM ----- Original Message ----- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net. > > In current terminology, we have three terms 'set', 'class', and 'type'. > The words 'set' and 'type' have long histories in both technical and > informal usage, and there is no confusion about their meanings. > > The word 'class' has been used in so many conflicting ways in both > technical and informal usage that it causes a great deal of confusion. > > Therefore, my recommendation is to prefer the words 'set' and 'type' > for all metalevel usage, both technical and informal. The word > 'class' could still be used for particular languages in which it > is endemic. But to promote precision, the words 'set' and 'type' > should be preferred for all cross-language discussions. > > John Sowa > Don't forget the word 'concept', as used in natural language. The Rand ITOE 1990 book is a good reference for concept-related terminology. Rand terminology is based on Aristotle. My tabula rasa terminology is based on Rand. > Dick McCullough http://mkrmke.org _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@ontolog.cim3.net Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@ontolog.cim3.net Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 08:04:59 UTC