- From: Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:48:54 -0400
- To: Evan Prodromou <evan@status.net>
- Cc: public-ostatus@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAz=scmq5+rdzs6OO5j29BZEWnSWJ_6Msmy7yFWXY8DbCHJRNg@mail.gmail.com>
On 16 April 2012 09:41, Evan Prodromou <evan@status.net> wrote: > So, I'd like to propose the following from the POV of the OStatus > community group: > > - We decide if it's going to matter for us what the IETF says. My > feeling is yes; if one or the other gets deprecated, it will make it harder > to depend on that deprecated one in the future. > > +1. My take is that this sort of functionality is winner-takes all, like DNS. > > - We ask someone to take the job of "representing" OStatus in this > discussion at the IETF. They'd need to work with the IETF liaison at W3C: > http://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison > > +1 and -1. Having an official representative is a good idea to communicate a consensus view of OStatus, but individuals should make their voices heard on the IETF list directly. The latter is actually more important because of the way that the IETF works. > > - We come up with a simple proposal based on strengths and weaknesses > of the two approaches, and ask the representative to present that. > > +1, but as with the previous point, individuals should express their support directly on the apps-discuss list. b.
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 13:49:43 UTC