Re: OStatus and webfinger vs swd

+1

I was really concerned when it became apparent that SWD was going to be
"standardised" within the OAuth working group, away from the sort of
involvement that a project like that really demands.

Now that SWD and Webfinger are being considered within the apps area, the
big opportunity (and challenge) is to engage the effort there. By doing so,
we can ensure that the standard that results is something that meets the
needs of the community that is already using the technology. So, please go
to the apps-discuss list and post your ideas / thoughts / concerns!

b.

On 14 April 2012 05:28, Goix Laurent Walter <
laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it> wrote:

> Ostatus (but also other community initiatives in the area of fsw) have
> been using (meaning implementing, testing & validating) webfinger for years
> now and it would be indeed a pity to throw away this work. That said, the
> 'ietf' webfinger may be a good momentum for cleaning up/improving the
> original community spec with future proof features & the feedback gathered
> over the last years.
>
> I agree that anyway all the current fsw initiatives should align with the
> solution that will be adopted in ietf (wf or swd) to limit fragmentation.
>
> Walter
>
> Le 14 avr. 2012 à 08:34, "elf Pavlik" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> a
> écrit :
>
> > --- Begin forwarded message from Michiel de Jong ---
> > From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
> > To: ostatus-discuss <ostatus-discuss@googlegroups.com>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:27:11 +0000
> > Subject: OStatus and webfinger vs swd
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > There's a discussion going on about webfinger vs swd:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08736.html
> >
> > There will be a choice between one or the other, and then the other
> > one will be deprecated. The discussion will take place on
> > apps-discuss@ietf.org, and the OAuth WG already has committed to
> > accepting whatever outcome from it. I think OStatus should commit to
> > it, too.
> >
> > It would be really bad if there finally were concensus about this, and
> > then OStatus would ruin it by not recognizing that concensus. What do
> > you think?
> >
> > I think this is important.
> >
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Michiel
> > --- End forwarded message ---
> >
>
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle
> persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante
> dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora
> abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di
> darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua
> distruzione, Grazie.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged
> information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying,
> printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and
> advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
>
>