- From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:45:38 +0000
- To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2017 17:46:20 UTC
Peter said: “Being the author of Appendix B, I'm in favor of it :). I think it makes more sense to wait until it's moved into BUNDLE and then reference it there, but in general, yes, I think one copy of the rules that everyone agrees on is better than two copies.” [BA] Indeed. In particular, I would like to encourage ORTC CG participants who have filed Issues against the current ORTC API RTP/RTCP matching rules to review the proposed rules in JSEP Appendix B. In my (cursory) review, the proposed rules do resolve those Issues. However, it seems that the hard part of RTP/RTCP matching rules is not resolving any particular issue, but ensuring that proposals do not create new ones ☹ So the more eyes on the proposal, the better.
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2017 17:46:20 UTC