Re: [ortc] [non rtcp-mux pain] Doesn't RTCRtpReceiver belong to RTCDtlsTransport?

2016-02-01 21:48 GMT+01:00 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>:
> An RtpSender or RtpReceiver is not bound to a particular DtlsTransport
> permanently.  The RtpSender.transport can be changed on the fly.  Otherwise,
> you wouldn't be able to implement BUNDLE in PeerConneciton on top of ORTC.
>
> Further, that would mean that a DTLS thing know about RTP things, which is
> kind of weird.  A DTLS thing should really only know about DTLS.

Yes, I did not properly expose my concerns. They are more about
"internal design" when implementing ORTC with all the non rtcp-mux
capabilities.

Thanks. I'll close the issue.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2016 13:00:55 UTC