- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:37:44 +0200
- To: Erik Lagerway <elagerway@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Vivien Lacourba <vivien@w3.org>
2016-04-26 22:09 GMT+02:00 Erik Lagerway <elagerway@gmail.com>: > We (ORTC editors, spec authors, chairs) will not submit Issues or PRs in the WG on behalf of another person or organization. I can understand that the current purpose of ORTC is, in fact, modeling a better API for WebRTC (2.0?). However, I don't understand why CG members cannot propose changes directly into the ORTC CG. Basically that means that, regardless I follow ORTC progress, I must propose changes into the WebRTC WG and, if they are accepted there, the ORTC editors would incorporate them into the ORTC spec. No sense IMHO and, honestly, I'm totally lost regarding the purpose of ORTC given that just a few ones can propose spec/API changes in there. Anyhow, thanks a lot for your comment and clarification. Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 23:38:32 UTC