- From: Roman Shpount <rshpount@turbobridge.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:23:49 -0400
- To: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 17:24:18 UTC
Should we add optional parameter of type HashAlgorithmIdentifier ( https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html#dfn-HashAlgorithmIdentifier) to generateCertificate? It seems strange that it is not there already. _____________ Roman Shpount On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> wrote: > WebRTC 1.0 added an (optional) Certificate Management API in Section 5.5 > in the last Editor’s draft. This appears needed in ORTC API in order to > solve the DtlsTransport forking problem. > > > > So below find the proposed text to be inserted in Section 15. Some > oddities found in the API: > > > > a. keygenAlgorithm only specifies the algorithm used to generate > the key – it does not specify the hash algorithm. So if in future we > needed to transition from SHA-256 to some other hash algorithm, it isn’t > clear how that would happen. > > b. In practice, implementations are likely to use the certificate > generation functionality in the underlying DTLS implementation (e.g. > BoringSSL, OpenSSL, S-Channel, etc.). So why the references to WebCrypto? > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 17:24:18 UTC