RE: DataChannel: negotiated behaviour appears to be not possible to implement (#233)

Perhaps somewhat 'hacky', but I see no reason beyond elegance that the negotiated state cannot be tacked onto the label, such as MESSAGENAME--Negotiated or some more obtuse character string, unless there's an expectation that this field will exceed 65,000 characters.
 
Just my two cents.
 
From: Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com
To: public-ortc@w3.org
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 16:34:32 +0000
Subject: DataChannel: negotiated behaviour appears to be not possible to  implement (#233)

Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 12:51:03 UTC