- From: Justin Skinner <skinnzer@live.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:37:09 -0400
- To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@microsoft.com>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 12:51:03 UTC
Perhaps somewhat 'hacky', but I see no reason beyond elegance that the negotiated state cannot be tacked onto the label, such as MESSAGENAME--Negotiated or some more obtuse character string, unless there's an expectation that this field will exceed 65,000 characters. Just my two cents. From: Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com To: public-ortc@w3.org Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 16:34:32 +0000 Subject: DataChannel: negotiated behaviour appears to be not possible to implement (#233)
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 12:51:03 UTC