- From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:25:49 -0500
- To: Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>
- Cc: "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHBDyN7qm-wqA7GRydVHGvxvELKbmHnYmCXR6q+91AEyooDHig@mail.gmail.com>
What's the timezone? On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote: > It's getting near that time again, the proposed date for the next ORTC CG > Meeting: > > Friday October 17 at 1pm. > > The draft agenda: > > --- > > Review of spec changes > > Outstanding 1.0 issues > - Stats > - IdP > - Synchronize with 1.0 > - Datachannel ? > > Rename IceListener to IceGatherer > > Latching rules definition & added into spec > - Undefined RTP listening behavior - issue 48 > Discuss SVC "automatic" configuration scenario vs manual configuration > > Call for implementations. Existing reference implementations: > - ORTC Library: > http://www.slideshare.net/ErikLagerway/ortc-lib-introduction > - Call for help, there is plenty to do, some examples: > - Browsers - JS Shim work > - Servers - Node.js work eg. SIP to ORTC Gateway > - Google progress; Canary 39 Sender/Receiver - JS bindings, when will we > see the rest of the ORTC API ? > - Microsoft progress; Progress of Modern API? Under Consideration to > Under Development ? > > Discuss options to migrate this work into the W3C WebRTC WG > > --- > > Comments? Are we missing anything? > > /Erik > > > > *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash > <http://hookflash.com/> * | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter > <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * >
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 17:26:17 UTC