RE: double maxBitrate => unsigned long maxBitrate from Bernard Aboba on 2014-10-31 (public-ortc@w3.org from October 2014)

From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:11:23 +0000
To: Shijun Sun <shijuns@microsoft.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <30164ea9ab564dcea34de66dbc2f7418@BLUPR03MB133.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

Agree.  Did we decide what the units of maxBitrate were?  If it's just bps, might be better to have unsigned long long. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Shijun Sun [mailto:shijuns@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:07 PM
To: Peter Thatcher; public-ortc@w3.org
Subject: RE: double maxBitrate => unsigned long maxBitrate

On October 30, 2014 4:59 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
>  maxBitrate is currently defined as a double.  But since we won't have fractions of bits, an unsigned long probably makes more sense than a double. 

+1

Received on Friday, 31 October 2014 00:11:53 UTC