RE: ORTC CG Meeting 6 - Final Agenda

We'll try to do that, yes

--sent from my mobile
On 17 Oct 2014 1:02 PM, "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com> wrote:

>  Will this be recorded and made available on afterwards?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> *From:* elagerway@gmail.com [mailto:elagerway@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Erik
> Lagerway
> *Sent:* 16 October 2014 22:35
> *To:* public-ortc@w3.org
> *Subject:* ORTC CG Meeting 6 - Final Agenda
>
>
>
> Video Conference / Jisti Link: https://jitsi.tools.ietf.org/ortc
>
> Time: 8am PDT
>
> *Agenda*
>
> Review of spec changes
>
> Outstanding 1.0 issues
> – Stats
> – IdP
> – Synchronize with 1.0
> – Datachannel ?
>
> Rename IceListener to IceGatherer
>
> Latching rules definition & added into spec
> – Undefined RTP listening behavior – issue 48
>
> Discuss SVC “automatic” configuration scenario vs manual configuration
>
> Call for Implementations
>
> Existing reference implementations:
>
> – ORTC Library:
> http://www.slideshare.net/ErikLagerway/ortc-lib-introduction
> – Call for help, there is plenty to do, some examples:
> – Browsers: JS Shim work
> – Servers: Node.js work eg. SIP to ORTC Gateway
>
> Google progress; Canary 39 Sender/Receiver – JS bindings? When will we see
> the rest of the ORTC API ?
>
> Microsoft progress; Progress of Modern API? Under Consideration to Under
> Development?
>
> Discuss options to migrate this work into the W3C WebRTC WG?
>
>
>   Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | Hookflash
> <http://hookflash.com/> | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/elagerway>
>