- From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:40:07 +0000
- To: Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Robin Raymond said:
" Just to be clear, this is being suggested for the case the remote side does not support full trickle ICE?"
[BA] I believe that is the goal, based on the text of the pull request that Martin submitted:
https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/20
readonly attribute boolean? canTrickleIce
This attribute indicates whether the remote peer is able to
accept trickled ICE candidates [[TRICKLE-ICE]]. The value is
determined based on whether a remote description indicates support
for trickle ICE, as defined in Section 4.1.9 of [JSEP]. Prior to
the completion of setRemoteDescription, this value is null.
Other useful background:
WEBRTC WG minutes from TPAC: http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-webrtc-minutes.html
Issue status: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25828
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 23:40:36 UTC