- From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:01:30 +0000
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- CC: "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Yes, it should be clarified, and when the security draft is updated, we can reference that as well. -----Original Message----- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:ibc@aliax.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:04 PM To: Bernard Aboba Cc: public-ortc@w3.org Subject: Re: About non rtcp-mux and DTLS connections 2014-07-30 22:40 GMT+02:00 Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>: > [BA] RFC 5764 Section 3 creates some confusion about what is to be expected in the non-mux case: one DTLS session or two? > > However, AFAIK RFC 5763 provides no way to signal the use of only a single DTLS session, and all existing WebRTC implementations utilize distinct DTLS sessions for RTP and RTCP in the non-mux case. > > So I think that distinct DTLS sessions is the only way it can work in practice. Fine with me. Could it be clarified in the spec? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2014 00:02:01 UTC