Wednesday, 30 April 2014
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
- Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC.
Tuesday, 29 April 2014
Monday, 28 April 2014
- Re: ice restart ?
- Re: ice restart ?
- Re: data channel send flow control?
- Re: ice restart ?
- Re: ice restart ?
- Re: data channel send flow control?
- Re: ice restart ?
Saturday, 26 April 2014
- Re: ice restart ?
- Re: ice restart ?
- Re: ice restart ?
- Re: ice restart ?
- Re: ICE use cases
- ice restart ?
- Re: RTCRtpCapabilities "features" ?
Friday, 25 April 2014
- Issue 60: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction (and also improve WebRTC 1.0 compatibility)
- Issue 60: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction (and also improve WebRTC 1.0 compatibility)
- Issue #26: Error handling
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: RTCSession object
- Re: RTCSession object
- Re: RTCSession object
- Re: RTCSession object
- RTCSession object
- headerExtensions of type sequence<DOMString>
- RTCRtpCapabilities "features" ?
- data channel send flow control?
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
Thursday, 24 April 2014
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
Wednesday, 23 April 2014
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- RE: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute
- RE: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal")
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal")
- Issue #65: Section 8.4: RTCRtpFeatures
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute
Saturday, 19 April 2014
Friday, 18 April 2014
- RE: tcpType parameter
- Re: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute
- Re: tcpType parameter
- RE: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute
- RE: tcpType parameter
- Re: Separate proposal on quality (was part of the "big proposal")
Thursday, 17 April 2014
- Re: Separate proposal on quality (was part of the "big proposal")
- Actions from CG meeting
- ICE use cases
- Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48)
- Re: TCP active/passive/actpass/holdconn
- Re: Using Factory Method Pattern vs Constructor pattern
- Re: Separate proposal on quality (was part of the "big proposal")
- Re: Issue 41: Support for ICE-TCP (RFC 6544)
- Re: Issue #40: RTCRtpDtlsTransportState
Wednesday, 16 April 2014
- RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- Re: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal")
- Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute
- RE: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal")
- RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
- TCP active/passive/actpass/holdconn
Tuesday, 15 April 2014
- Separate proposal on quality (was part of the "big proposal")
- Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal")
- Splitting up the "Big Proposal" on layering and quality into separate proposals: layering and quality
- A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction.
Monday, 14 April 2014
- Re: ORTC CG Meeting - Update
- ORTC CG Meeting - Update
- Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48)
- Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48)
- Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48)
- Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48)
- Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48)
- Issue 58: RTCIceListener Example 6 (Section 4.4)
- Re: [ortc] Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate? (#42)
- Re: [ortc] Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate? (#42)
- Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48)
- Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48)
Sunday, 13 April 2014
- Re: [ortc] Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate? (#42)
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- RtcRtpReceiver matching rules for payload, SSRC and receiverId
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
- Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling
- ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components
Saturday, 12 April 2014
- Re: Using Factory Method Pattern vs Constructor pattern
- Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling
- ICE Gather and Warmth policies
- Re: Flushing ICE candidates
- Re: Flushing ICE candidates
- Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling
- Re: Latest editor's draft
- Re: Latest editor's draft
- Flushing ICE candidates
- Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling
- Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling
- Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling
- Latest editor's draft
Friday, 11 April 2014
- Re: Using Factory Method Pattern vs Constructor pattern
- Using Factory Method Pattern vs Constructor pattern
- Re: camelCase for event listeners
- Re: camelCase for event listeners
- Re: camelCase for event listeners
Thursday, 10 April 2014
Wednesday, 9 April 2014
- Current ORTC API Issues list
- Re: camelCase for event listeners
- RE: camelCase for event listeners
- Re: camelCase for event listeners
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
Monday, 7 April 2014
Saturday, 5 April 2014
Thursday, 3 April 2014
Wednesday, 2 April 2014
- Issue 43: WebIDL Section 3.2.2: "sequence" as an attribute prohibited
- Issue 42: Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate?
- Issue 42: Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate?
- Issue 41: Support for ICE-TCP (RFC 6544)
- Issue #40: RTCRtpDtlsTransportState