On 19 February 2014 15:44, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote: > I think we still need scale for simulcast and maxBitrate for cases where you > want to constrain bandwidth even when it's available. And priority vs. > resources seems pretty similar. I'd like to take simulcast out actually. I think that aside from some bindings necessary to get playback right, you can achieve simulcast transmission (what we are talking about here) by having multiple tracks with different resolution constraints. I don't think that means fewer options sadly. Maybe we can also discuss minimums. I don't think that it's worthwhile having minimum values initially, and maybe not ever, though I'm open to the idea. And I think that it's a universally applicable thing across all axes. I can see cases for minimums on all three: frame rate (sign language), resolution (1x1, my image recognition can't deal), and quality (my eyes, ow, my eyes).Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 23:53:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:39:24 UTC