On 18 February 2014 10:06, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> wrote: > Given the current spec, the only way to support this would be by using alternate constructors for RTCRtpReceiver and RTCRtpSender, which seems a bit funky. I wouldn't have thought so. Switch DtlsTransport for StrpSdesTransport. Maybe there is a common ancestor that these two classes share that the Rtp classes depend on, but that's a second order concern. At a high level, it seems fairly straightforward to perform the substitution.Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 19:20:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:39:24 UTC