Re: RTCConnection: archaeology from Martin Thomson on 2014-02-18 (public-orca@w3.org from February 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:20:29 -0800
To: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-orca@w3.org" <public-orca@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV98Do3gEEP-ahDEQCOO1D+SrWK7NEq+F0Q4-WWaq9obQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 18 February 2014 10:06, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Given the current spec, the only way to support this would be by using alternate constructors for RTCRtpReceiver and RTCRtpSender, which seems a bit funky.


I wouldn't have thought so.  Switch DtlsTransport for
StrpSdesTransport.  Maybe there is a common ancestor that these two
classes share that the Rtp classes depend on, but that's a second
order concern.  At a high level, it seems fairly straightforward to
perform the substitution.

Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 19:20:58 UTC