Re: ICE state diagram question

I was under the impression that the omission of 'failed' was accidental. I
don't see any reason why it wouldn't make sense for ORTC.


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Bernard Aboba
<Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>wrote:

>  In the ORTC editor’s draft (see
> http://ortc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ortc.html), the “failed” state
> is not an enumerated state in RTCIceTransportState (Section 3.6), which is
> different from WebRTC 1.0’s RTCIceconnectionState (Section 4.4.3).
>
>
>
> Is the assumption that the resulting (non-normative) ICE state machine
> diagram in ORTC would look like the one in WebRTC 1.0 (see below), with the
> removal of the failed state and associated transitions?
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/images/icestates.svg
>
>
>
>
>