Re: Discussion and Consensus [via ORCA - Object-RTC API Community Group]

Great points Michael, all the more reason to have those discussions in the
Community Group.

/Erik

Erik Lagerway | Mobile: 1.604.562.8647


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <
Michael.Champion@microsoft.com> wrote:

> +1.  A lot of thought and legal advice went into creating the Community
> Group process so that it is both lightweight and legally sound.  We can
> save ourselves a lot of potential pain in the future by making sure that if
> someone contributes an idea,  they are agreeing to make it available a
> royalty-free license.  See
> http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/cla/.
>
> The Github issues list is a great forum for discussing how to implement
> the API and in surfacing problems in the API, but let's discuss the API
> itself in the Community Group mailing list and wiki.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Lagerway [mailto:elagerway@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:32 PM
> To: public-orca@w3.org
> Subject: Discussion and Consensus [via ORCA - Object-RTC API Community
> Group]
>
> Two points... I would like to propose that discussions regarding the API
> happen via the ORCA Community Group, the public-orca@w3c.org mail list
> seems to make sense. If you have not subscribed to that list yet and wish
> to receive messages sent to the list please do so here. As part of this
> proposal, I suggest we abide by [...]
>
>
>
> ----------
>
> This post sent on ORCA - Object-RTC API Community Group
>
>
>
> 'Discussion and Consensus'
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/orca/2013/08/27/discussion-and-consensus/
>
>
>
> Learn more about the ORCA - Object-RTC API Community Group:
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/orca
>
>
>
>