- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:44:07 -0400
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- CC: public-openw3c@w3.org
On 8/12/14 1:23 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > [speaking about "open w3c"...] we probably need to drag in the W3C team people trying to sort this out (I think that's PLH). It would be great to get a status update on where all this is at. I'm worried that we might be doing duplicate work here by even discussing this stuff. As a reminder, earlier I mentioned this general "/TR graveyard" issue is now captured as [Issue-106] for the W3Process group and I still think that group is the best venue to discuss it, and I think Consortium staff are members of that group. I don't know if that group has agreed on a `priority` for Issue-106 but if you or anyone else considers it a high priority, then please send a related e-mail to public-w3process and include the literal "issue-106" in the Subject or Body of the email (this will make sure that group's issue tracker automagically includes your email in the issue's `paper trail`). -Thanks, AB [Issue-106] <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/106>
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 18:44:40 UTC