Re: Annotation Serializations

For what it's

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi, Tim, Ivan–
>
> Yeah, what Tim said.
>
> But I also think there's a broader, more straightforward rationale:
>
> For a vast number of use cases, possibly the majority, the consumer of an
> annotation will see it in HTML, in the form of footnotes, comments, or
> proper annotations (like the Annotator sidebar or stickynotes); in many of
> these cases, the annotation will even be stored as HTML, or a some
> intermediate format like markdown that is predictably transformable into
> HTML, rather than in some abstracted form like RDF or JSON or even
> normalized SQL. Many annotations will be only accessible as HTML, even
> through a service's API; think of Twitter, which will let you embed a tweet
> on a page by hitting their API and getting back the HTML snippet.
>
> So, if we think it would be desirable to be able to consume, aggregate, and
> catalog those annotations, we will want to provide clear guidance for how
> developers of annotation-producing software (e.g., microblogs, commenting
> systems, annotation libraries, and so on) can make markup that can be
> explicitly consumed as conforming to the OA data model.
>
> Regards-
> -Doug

For what it's worth, this is more or less how I intend to use OA. In
fact, I designed this protocol:  http://doriantaylor.com/rdf-kv
(reference implementation:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RDF-KV/lib/RDF/KV.pm ) with OA in mind.

-- 
Dorian Taylor
Make things. Make sense.
http://doriantaylor.com

Received on Monday, 20 January 2014 10:49:29 UTC