- From: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:24:54 -0500
- To: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 15:25:21 UTC
Dear all, I had a brief conversation with Stephane Corlosquet who belongs to the RDFa Working Group. He pointed out that while we are absolutely free to pick our own prefix definitions, we could consider of aligning them with the prefixes of the RDFa core context: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 In particular, that would mean to map dc = http://purl.org/dc/terms/ dc11 = http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ It seems, the DC folks recommended those prefixes to the RDFa WG because they want to slowly deprecate the old 1.1 elements. It is probably not crucial but, in general, I think it is probably a good idea to align our context with existing ones in the same ecosystem. Best, Paolo -- Dr. Paolo Ciccarese http://www.paolociccarese.info/ Biomedical Informatics Research & Development Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital Member of the MGH Biomedical Informatics Core +1-857-366-1524 (mobile) +1-617-768-8744 (office) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the addressee(s), may contain information that is considered to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to any other party without the permission of the sender. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 15:25:21 UTC