Re: W3C Annotation Working Group?

Thanks Puneet, that's great news.  We're glad to have the support of
Creative Commons -- the "Open" in the name of the community group isn't
just for show, and I'm certain that CC will be able to provide essential
support towards really opening up the current annotation silos on the web :)

Simone, Richard ... Invited Expert status is logistically difficult to
achieve, so if there's any opportunity for membership through EC projects
or similar, that would definitely be the preferred route.  As far as F2F
meetings go, as Ivan said it would be up to the WG to decide, but Santa
Clara would be a logical choice.

Rob


On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Mr. Puneet Kishor <
punkish@creativecommons.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Jan 8, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please let us know your thoughts on this idea!  While we think that a
> formal TR will carry significantly more weight than the current community
> draft, especially with larger industrial potential adopters, and that a
> broader scope of work can strengthen the market, we want to make sure you
> agree that the creation of a WG is the right thing to do at this stage. Do
> you think this is the right step? Would you be interested in participating
> in this proposed WG? Please give us your comments here!
>
>
>
> Yes and yes to both your questions.
>
>
> --
> Puneet Kishor
> Science and Data Policy, Creative Commons
>