- From: Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:53:30 -0700
- To: Herbert van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
I'm now thinking about re-evaluating this as a fragment selector with an xpointer syntax range syntax rather than expand the selector space. That seems like the most rigorously specified w3 approach. On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Herbert van de Sompel > <hvdsomp@gmail.com> wrote: >> hi Randall, >> >> I did a brief presentation about Open Annotation at a recent EUDAT >> meeting (http://www.eudat.eu/2nd-eudat-user-forum) and got a question >> from the audience along the same lines of what you describe. If I >> remember correctly the person asking the question was involved in TEI >> work. > > Something similar just came up in the change tracking WG, as well. > > It seems many people desire to serialize document ranges. I do think > the DOM Range spec is the sensible place to start, but it doesn't > define a serialization. > > Maybe someone ought to?
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2013 01:53:59 UTC