- From: Herbert van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:05:03 -0700
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-openannotation@w3.org
Stian, all, I think what you are describing is rather similar to the direction that the new, 2-level, bibliographic framework that is being devised by the Library of Congress is taking. See a recent presentation by Erik Miller at http://www.niso.org/news/events/2013/dcmi/bibframework Herbert On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > --- this is getting off topic, but it's good to hear there is interest! > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > >> Without even criticizing the model a single second, I see indeed >> distinctions like "digital resource", "digital artifact", etc. I've fought >> with these for too long in my domain, and I can see cans of worms flashing >> around and long reading and discussions coming... > > Yes, that is a big can of worm, not too dissimilar from the HTTP Range > 14 discussions (about resources and their representations being the > same 'thing' or not). > > In PAV we simply try to say that authorship/contribution has to do > with the knowledge or content that is represented ("IP" if you like, > although I hate the term), and "creation" has to do with making the > digital form this take (not necessarily the exact representation like > RDF/XML vs Turtle). How this split is realized, if at all, is domain > and application specific. > > For instance it's quite straight forward for a Word document where I > typed in a chapter from Lord of the Rings, then that word document was > pav:authoredBy J. R. R. Tolkien and pav:createdBy Stian, and it was > pav:createdWith Word. In PROV terms, you can think of authorship as > something that belongs to a more general, abstract entity that the > "digital resource" is a prov:specializationOf. > > > Similarly for annotations, if I take the author's handwritten notes in > the original Lord of the Rings manuscript and formalize them as > oa:Annotation's, then those annotations are pav:authoredBy :Tolkien > and pav:createdBy :Stian. > > > However this gets trickier the moment the knowledge itself is a > digital thing rather than something which is merely represented with > digital concepts; for instance an ontological model, an RDF dataset, a > spreadsheet that calculates mortgage payments. For simple cases the > creator and author is just the same person, so there is no problem, > and you might want to only represent one of those. > > The distinction can come into play when one talks about > transformations of formats and similar, which PAV provides more > specialized terms for, like pav:importedFrom and pav:importedBy. So > if you made the spreadsheet in excel and I just copy it and put it on > my website, then you are still both the author and creator, and I mark > the provenance to the orginal using pav:retrievedFrom and my role > using pav:retrievedBy. > > If I then saved it in OpenOffice format, then you are still the author > of my OO spreadsheet, while I am now the creator. (as here I consider > the workings of the spreadsheet as the 'knowledge'). retrievedFrom > changes to importedFrom. However if I also needed to fix a formula in > the spreadsheet to make it work in Open Office, then I also become a > curator (pav:curatedBy). > > ( In a different domain it could be that a spreadsheet contains survey > data imported from a CSV which was extracted from a survey database ; > here the authorship relates to the survey data, while creation might > deals with making it into a tabular format, no matter if it has been > converted from CSV to XLS.) > > If I add a bit of new functionality, then I am a contributor > (pav:contributedBy), and the OO spreadsheet is now just > pav:derivedFrom the original rather than imported from it. If that > functionality is "significant", then I would now also be an author. If > your bit is superseded by my 3d version, then now you remain only as > an author of the spreadsheet that my spreadsheet was pav:derivedFrom. > > .. and with that I think I explained almost the whole model... *copy to paper*. > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > -- Herbert Van de Sompel Digital Library Research & Prototyping Los Alamos National Laboratory, Research Library http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/ ==
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 00:05:32 UTC