- From: Leyla Jael García Castro <leylajael@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:50:40 +0000
- To: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACLxDV56yBGXVuM7DQ5wZiY1thcAKaVGHcHpeoJrEzf=ujLomw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments to “Bookmarking a Webpage” at www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/SE_Bookmarking_a_Webpage The definition of bookmarking used in the example says “*In the context of the World Wide Web (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web) , a bookmark is a locally stored Uniform Resource Identifier ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier)*”. However, it is also possible to save bookmarks not locally but online, for instance in delicious… maybe the Wikipedia page should be updated? Or maybe we should extend this definition in our example in order to also include online bookmarking systems. oa:annotatedAt and oa:serializedAt do not extend from w3prov:generatedAtTime but are inspired in, are not they? So the range should be xsd:dateTime rather than plain Literals. Right now, as quotes are used for both, it is difficult to make clear the difference. I am not sure whether it is right to use a Literal as range for foaf:mbox. At http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_mbox, it says that Thing is the range… should it be an Object rather than a Literal? Do we want to encourage the use of dctypes:Text along with cnt:ContextAsText? If the answer is yes, then we should add it to the figure as well as a note reminding that it is a MAY In the natural language explanations for the SPARQL queries, it should be ex:person1 rather than ex:Person1 We have a type foaf:Person for ex:person1 but no type for ex:software1, should not is be a foaf:Agent? In general Looking at this example I found a bit strange the relation oa:motivatedBy. With oa:annotatedBy and oa:generateBy it is possible to respond questions related to “who” while with oa:hasBody it is possible to respond questions related to “what”. Would not it better to have oa:hasMotivation rather than oa:motivatedBy? Should we include a legend at the beginning of the cookbook or maybe better in the introduction explaining the different “boxes” that we use in diagrams? Do the different colors mean something? Also, should we use a different line type in order to distinguish mandatory properties from optional? Cheers, Leyla
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 20:51:27 UTC