- From: Steve Richard <steve.richard@azgs.az.gov>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:26:36 -0700
- To: 'Raphaël Troncy' <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, "'Robert Sanderson'" <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Antoine Isaac'" <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "'public-openannotation'" <public-openannotation@w3.org>
It looks like INFO is the registered URI scheme, and DOI is a namespace that uses that scheme. From that point of view, DOI URI's would need to look something like "INFO:DOI/"DIR"."REG"/"DSS > -----Original Message----- > From: Raphaël Troncy [mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:53 PM > To: Robert Sanderson > Cc: Antoine Isaac; public-openannotation > Subject: Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) > > Dear Robert, > > > The major issues were: > > * DOIs are not URIs. eg There's no DOI in: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html > > I thought it was ... via the info-URI namespace (IETF RFC 4452, > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4452.txt) as noted by the DOI FAQ, > http://www.doi.org/faq.html ... and of course DOI names can be expressed as > URLs, this is the http://dx.doi.org/ resolver. Am I missing something? > > Raphaël > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech > Multimedia Communications Department > 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 04:27:08 UTC