Re: Review of future/core.html

Leyla,
if you want to help me double checking the Cookbook examples that would be
of big help.

I started updating the existing examples (Scenarios) one by one:
http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/Cookbook

I have done:
http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/SE_Bookmarking_a_Webpage

Any feedback/edit will be appreciated.

Paolo


On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
>>
>>> 11) This section should clarify that semantic terms, such as semantic
>>> tags with oa:Tag would often be in the form of fragment URIs, but as
>>> this is not for the purpose of selecting a part of a resource, but
>>> identifying a concept, such URIs are perfectly OK and SHOULD NOT be
>>> specified using a Selector.
>>>
>>
>> About semantic tags, I did not see any link pointing to further examples.
>> I volunteer to do some, anyone else interested? Maybe with examples I will
>> have some more comments about this section as right now it seems pretty
>> simple but I am not sure that is the case with semantic tags. I
>> particularly have a case with several semantic tags annotating a piece
>> within a document. Anyone else interested? Just to make sure I am
>> understanding what semantic tags are about in OA, @Paolo, typical cases
>> would be similiar to those modeled as Qualifiers in AO, am I right?
>>
>
> The first examples on Tags are meant to be created in the Cookbook. The
> reason why there isn't any right now was related to the fact we added the
> revised Tags to the specs very recently. The old examples are not up to
> date. I will do my best to update them today.
>
> If you would like to create other example with use cases that are not
> currently listed in the Cookbook feel free to do so, the contribution will
> be much appreciated!
>
>
>>
>> By now, some questions. How would it work if we want to have a
>> descriptive, human-readable tag but also a semantic tag? As we can have
>> multiple bodies, in principle, I can have both, but how should I make
>> explicit the relationship between the tag and the semantic tag? That
>> relationship is probably not needed if I have only one tag and one semantic
>> tag, but I could have more and then I would like to be able to pair
>> tag-semantic tags somehow, Would it be a named graph the way to do it?
>>
>>
>>


-- 
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
http://www.paolociccarese.info/
Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
+1-857-366-1524 (mobile)   +1-617-768-8744 (office)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the addressee(s),
may contain information that is considered
to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to
any other party without the permission of the sender.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately.