- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:40:57 -0700
- To: Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
You're perfectly correct, we don't want people to change our pre-defined Motivations, we want them to create their own in their own namespaces. The new:correcting and new2:fixing examples are the extensions, the oa: namespaced terms are in the RDF example only to give something to relate those hypothetical extensions to. Hope that helps! Rob On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote: > Ummm, in the Feb 8 > http://openannotation.org/spec/core/appendices.html#ExtendingMotivations > the example avows > > oa:motivationScheme a skos:ConceptScheme ; > > and then puts some skos data on it, presumably in order to support the > skos breadth comparisons to oa:editing. > > Rather than expect such triples > > oa:motivationScheme a skos:ConceptScheme ; > > oa:editing a oa:Motivation ; > skos:inScheme oa:motivationScheme ; > skos:prefLabel "Editing"@en. > > to be in extension code, I would think such triples are actually > meant to be part of the spec in the case of every Section 2.3 declared > Motivation. > > In this case, I think I would also expect that for the most part, it > would be discouraged for extensions to change much of the skos in > these Section 2.3 Motivations except, perhaps the skos:prefLabel. > > In other words, I imagine that Appendix is not really inviting the > world to put whatever skos semantics it wishes on the Section 2.3 > instances. > > Am I confused? > > Bob > > > -- > Robert A. Morris > > Emeritus Professor of Computer Science > UMASS-Boston > 100 Morrissey Blvd > Boston, MA 02125-3390 > > IT Staff > Filtered Push Project > Harvard University Herbaria > Harvard University > > email: morris.bob@gmail.com > web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ > web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org > http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram > === > The content of this communication is made entirely on my > own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express > official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or > Harvard University. >
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 16:41:28 UTC