W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Semantic Tags (was several threads)

From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:10:10 +0100
Message-ID: <511120D2.7040100@eurecom.fr>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
CC: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-openannotation@w3.org
Dear all,

> Perhaps the examples should be a bit clearer about where the actual
> semantic tag URI can be found rather than using the generic <body1>
> URIs:
> <anno1> a oa:Annotation ;
>      oa:motivatedBy oa:tagging ;
>      oa:hasBody <http://example.com/vocab/term1> ;
>      oa:hasTarget <target1> ;
>    <http://example.com/vocab/term1> a oa:SemanticTag .
>    <target1> a dctypes:Image .
> (As almost always the terms would come from a different namespace)

Perhaps I will say something that you have already discussed at large, 
but the more I think, and the more I'm under the impression that you 
want to re-invent ctag:Tag with oa:SemanticTag. Am I wrong?

By ctag:Tag, I'm referring to common tag specification, which was hype 3 
or 4 years ago, http://www.commontag.org/QuickStartGuide because of a 
nice list of people who claim they will support it. However, we know 
that this has never flied. Sindice does not report a lot of document 
that contains a ctag:Tag class. But still, how oa:SemanticTag plans to 
differ from ctag:Tag?
Best regards.


Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
Multimedia Communications Department
450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 15:23:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:38:22 UTC