- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:19:38 -0700
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-openannotation@w3.org
Fixed, that was my poor understanding of what counted for reconciliation. Rob On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > Re-sending this one > >> >> On >> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/future/appendices.html >> as of January 27. Only one comment! >> >> "The skos:related or skos:closeMatch relationship" >> -> >> "A <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#mapping OR >> http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secmapping">SKOS mapping</a> relationship >> (skos:broaderMatch, skos:narrowMatch, skos:relatedMatch, skos:exactMatch or >> skos:closeMatch)" >> In retrospect, I don't think we should restrict the use of SKOS matching >> properties for re-conciliating two motivation extensions with overlapping >> scope. All of them could be useful. >> > > The current draft has still "Other reconciliation relationships, such > skos:related or skos:closeMatch". This should really be changed: > - skos:relatedMatch is the reconciliation relationship, not skos:related > - I believe it's quite important to mention skos:exactMatch. > > Antoine >
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 16:20:09 UTC