W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Last draft comment: Core

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:47:33 +0100
Message-ID: <510EBED5.70507@few.vu.nl>
To: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>

Some last small comments on
Some of them made already, but I'm not sure they were explicitly rejected, or just forgotten...

1. Presentation of Dublin Core Type classes being re-used in 2.1.1
"The most common classes are listed in the table below" seems to be contradicted by the heading for that table, "Model". Unless the intention is to re-used *only* these classes, in which case it should be made explicit in the text.

2. In 2.1.3, what does "As such, these resources MUST NOT be re-expressed using FragmentSelectors" mean?

3. In Fig.
  oa:hasTarget <target1>.;
->  oa:hasTarget <target1> .

4. Mapping to Dublin Core in 2.2
In an earlier version oa:annotatedBy (resp. oa:annotatedAt, oa:serializedBy) was mapped to dcterms:creator (resp. dcterms:created, dcterms:publisher. I'm not sure why these mappings were removed, as they seem quite right and the mapping to PROV does not really replace them.

5. Relation between  oa:semanticTagging and oa:tagging in 2.3
I support Stian's interrogation (and his implicit proposal) at
"oa:semanticTagging is skos:narrowerThan (?) oa:tagging"
The spec should reflect that
oa:semanticTagging skos:narrower oa:tagging
otherwise it may be difficult to convince implementers to create semantic relations for their motivation extensions.


Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 19:48:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:38:22 UTC