W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Last Ultimate Final Call :)

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:28:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CABevsUFHyNEcfiLHt4HSWWxcAU9aJOKkbPd+Oj8HuCdyqTJYsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Thanks Stian :)

And just to reinforce the last part of previous mail, I absolutely
understand the real world problem that people use the URIs of
documents to mean a concept that they describe.  Please, if there's a
solution that works with multiple bodies of different types, including
multiplicity constructs, then it will be done!

Note that the current recommendation of adding a node is exactly
equivalent to a Specific Resource:

The Body is a Specific Resource that identifies the tag aspect, not
the document aspect, of the Source (a URI that somehow identifies both
a document and a concept).

We could even push it into the Specific Resource module and leave
textual tagging in Core.

Would this be cleaner?

Rob


On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
<soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Thanks! The document is really good - I'm looking forward to sending it around.
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> This:
>>>> It is important to be aware of the consequences of using a Fragment URI, and the restrictions that using them places on implementations.
>>> Change to:
>>>> It is important to be aware of the consequences of using a Fragment URI for the purpose of identifying parts of a resource, and the restrictions that using them places on implementations.
>>
>> Done!
>>
>>
>>> As you did not want to add a 'disclaimer' for Fragment URIs for
>>> semantic tags. (which is the norm).
>>
>> The problem is that there's all sorts of uses of fragments that aren't
>> for segmentation of the resource.  I think that Jeni Tennison's
>> document (linked in the section on Fragments) covers the topic much
>> better than we could.
>>
>> Rob
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 17:28:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:38:22 UTC