- From: Jacob Jett <jgjett@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:09:03 -0600
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi Rob, So if I understand correctly oa:hasStyle & oa:hasScope will also be properties of oa:SpecificResources, is that correct? Everything else looks pretty good. I believe that everyone here at Illinois prefers the embedded textual bodies as you have them in the current draft of the of the /future/ spec. So +1 from us. We did have a quick question on the lists and containers, can a specific resource have multiple sources? Regards, Jacob On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > To summarize the changes, before Monday's launch: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Antoine: >> * Homogeneity of JSON context names > Done. > >> * Named / Embedded Graphs > Rewritten and reordered as suggested. > >> * Lists and Containers > Choice and Composite are subclasses of Alt and Bag, List is > dual-classed with an extensive note describing the issues. > >> * Specific Resources with Style and Scope > 3.1 rewritten to not include the diagram, and clarify that style and > scope are included in the definition of the identity of the specific > resource. > >> * Lack of consensus on Textual Bodies > No change. > > Rob >
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 16:10:11 UTC