Re: F2F Decision: Provenance

Hi all,

I guess the lack of reaction means everyone agrees :-)

I may have trouble the very idea of representing oa:Annotation as direct result of the generating, as opposed to the direct result of annotating. But I'll clearly need some more time to get my head around it.

One trivial for now is replacing oa:generator with oa:generatedBy.
This makes the property seem very close to prov:wasGeneratedBy, in a context where OA and PROV would be used together. While they are quite different in reality: range of oa:generatedBy would be agent, range of prov:wasGeneratedBy is prov:Activity.

Antoine


> This part of the discussion covered two primary topics related to
> provenance and the W3C Provenance Ontology.
>
> 1.  Can we replace oa:equivalent with something from the Prov work?
>
> Decision:  Yes, prov:alternateOf is semantically identical to oa:equivalent
> Thus we'll simply replace all mentions of oa:equivalent in the
> specification with prov:alternateOf
>
> 2.  What is the relationship between the current (simple) provenance
> information recorded for an annotation, and the Prov work?
>
> Decisions:
>   - Replace oa:generated with prov:generatedAt, as they are
> semantically identical
>   - Replace oa:generator with oa:generatedBy, and subclass of
> prov:wasAttributedTo
>   - Replace oa:annotated with oa:annotatedAt (to follow the generatedAt pattern)
>   - Replace oa:annotator with oa:annotatedBy
>   - Include a diagram of the mapping in the specification
>
> (Diagram attached)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rob&  Paolo

Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 10:39:45 UTC