- From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:18:41 +0200
- To: public-openannotation@w3.org
Dear Bob, dear Robert, Thanks for your elaborate answers. I understand Bob's concerns on the body restrictions, but I do not think this is a problem in my application. I can live with the fact that multiple tags live in multiple Annotation instances, and I can deal with the multilingual issues be assigning different language labels to the skos concepts I use as semantic tags To Robert: sorry if my example was not clear. The rdf:type of the tags (like Person versus Building) should of course be modeled on the semantic tags, as they are not restricted to this particular image. What I'm looking for is a way to model in general the nature of the relationship between the body and the target, so facts like is the body depicted on the target image or associated with it in another way. I think this is an issue for all pre-OA annotations that currently model annotations by simple (Body, Relation, Target) or (Target,Relation,Body) triples in RDF. If these applications want to move to using OA, it is clear where the Body and the Target end up in the OA model, but less clear where the Relation part fits in. For interoperability reasons I think it would be good if there where some hints on how to convert these single triple models to OA. Jacco
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 08:20:35 UTC