- From: Christian Morbidoni <christian.morbidoni@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:45:38 +0200
- To: public-openannotation@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAE_W9Bi5pBrpabfU7B2GiEWdqWs-uoqyXERdO0ghSFTMUPiSJg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, I'm vary happy that Named Graphs has been included in the specification as I think they are very useful. I'm in the process of modeling the Pundit (http://thepund.it) triplestore to conform to the relatively new specs. I have a couple of questions/doubts: "It is RECOMMENDED to have a dereferencable resource that contains the serialization of the graph, rather than to use Named Graphs." Does it means that Named Graphs, when used as body of an annotations should have URL and that this URL should be dereferenced to the triples contained in the named graph? If it is so I think it is a very good approach. Regarding the Structured Body ( http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/#StructuredBody): it seems a very strange approach to me. If there has already been a discussion about it please point me to it...I cannot find anything in the ML archive. I'm referring to the example that uses X, Y, Z, etc. The question is: how do I distinguish triples that belongs to the structured body from other triples that state something about Y, Z or X? May be the answer is in this sentence "Implementations that expect a resource with a serialization separate from the Annotation graph may not be able to store structured resources"? Does it mean that resource X, Y and Z should not be involved in triples other than the ones included in the structured body? Does it also mean that two different annotations cannot have structured bodies that talks about the same resource (e.g. Y)? Isn't it a bit too restrictive :-) ? best, Christian
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 15:48:51 UTC