Re: OntoLex FrAC Module Public Review

Hi,

I have one further comment on the public review version:

   - The range of "unit" is given as a string. It would be much better if
   these could be replaced by elements from a standard vocabulary such as
   LexInfo

Regards,
John

Ar Déar 17 Aib 2025 ag 10:19, scríobh John P. McCrae <
john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a reminder that we have one week left for public review comments.
> If you would find some time to review and make any comments that would be
> really appreciated.
>
> As there is already one comment, we will be reopening this module but if
> you have any comments now would be the best time to make it so that we can
> handle all comments in the 2nd public review.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> Ar Déar 23 Ean 2025 ag 11:38, scríobh John McCrae <
> john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>:
>
>> Dear OntoLex CG Members,
>>
>> The group working on the Frequency, Attestation and Corpus Information
>> (FrAC) module has completed the first draft of the specification, which is
>> now available for public review.
>>
>> All comments on the specification must be made as a post to
>> public-ontolex@w3.org by *April 23rd* in order to be considered. No
>> changes to the specification are allowed except in response to comments on
>> the public review. If no comments are received the specification will be
>> published as is.
>>
>> The specification files are available on GitHub at:
>>
>> https://ontolex.github.io/frequency-attestation-corpus-information/
>>
>> https://github.com/ontolex/frequency-attestation-corpus-information/blob/master/owl/frac.ttl
>>
>> I also attach them to this email.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John, Christian and Max
>>
>