- From: Thierry Declerck <declerck@dfki.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:55:47 +0200
- To: Fahad Khan <fahad.khan@ilc.cnr.it>
- Cc: Jorge Gracia del Río <jogracia@unizar.es>, public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <348ed202-7b1d-0455-2b95-12a3d00c71d4@dfki.de>
Hi Fahad, All, Well, especially in the field of Terminology, we should have a sloppy use of terms :-) But just jocking. Still, the confusion is made my many people (including myself in the past). Just as infomration: in the past, a TBX2RDF transformer was implemented (https://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Converting_TBX_to_RDF), making also use of a former version of Ontolex (SKOS was not integrated at that time). One option would to adapt the transfomer to the final specifications of Ontolex-Lemon. Cheers Thierry Am 19.06.2023 um 21:28 schrieb Fahad Khan: > Dear Thierry, > Thanks for the clarification. You are right that "serialisation" is a > sloppy use of language here which I'm effectively using as a shorthand > for something more like a crosswalk (the serialisation would > technically be to RDF/XML or turtle, etc,), if you like we can go with > representation from now on. Regarding your second point, I feel that > the Terminology module should offer the possibility of as faithful a > conversion or representation of TBX data into RDF as possible, and > even that this should be one of the main selling points of the module. > Cheers > Fahad > > Il giorno lun 19 giu 2023 alle ore 21:02 Thierry Declerck > <declerck@dfki.de> ha scritto: > > Hi Fahad, All, > > Thanks for the mail! From me just a "terminological" comment. The > ISO work is on "representing" the core of TBX in RDF, but not > on"serializing" TBX in RDF (as RDF is a modeling language). I > think that we have to be careful here (and the ISO committee, the > link you are pointing to) is using the right term (Representation). > > Besides this, I think that an Ontolex-driven representation of > terminology data should go beyond the "mere" reproduction of TBX > and should make full use of RDF-based modeling. Some of the points > Patricia mentioned in the document refered to by Jorge are related > to this point. > > Well just some thoughts. > > Cheers > > Thierry > > Am 19.06.2023 um 19:29 schrieb Fahad Khan: >> Dear All, >> As I mentioned in the W3C Day preparation meeting today, I was in >> Brussels last week for the annual ISO/TC 37 meeting where I >> became aware of work being carried out within the aegis of the >> terminological committee ISO/TC 37/SC 3 withthe aim of defining a >> serialisation of TBX into RDF. >> <https://www.iso.org/standard/84361.html> Subsequently I got into >> contact with Hanne Smaadahl, the chairperson of the committee, >> who was extremely enthusiastic about the prospect of the two >> groups coordinating their respective efforts in a case where >> there was a very strong chance of overlap ( as I recall one >> important use case for the new OntoLex module is the conversion >> of TBX datasets into RDF). I think it would be worth discussing >> this at the next terminology focused telco to try and understand >> what such collaboration might look like, especially given the >> closed nature of ISO standards, something which I guess is kind >> of anathema to our community (though I also think it makes no >> sense to have two rival RDF seralisations of TBX floating around). >> Cheers >> Fahad >> >> Il giorno lun 19 giu 2023 alle ore 19:10 Jorge Gracia del Río >> <jogracia@unizar.es> ha scritto: >> >> Dear W3C ontolex members, >> >> As you know, we recently started a discussion on a potential >> Terminology module for Ontolex. Our previous telco took place >> on 10th May, and it's time to schedule a new one. Please, >> those interested in participating fill in this doodle poll >> with some options in the first two weeks of July by the end >> of this week: https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/dwr0RRzb >> >> As a reminder, the main decision from the last telco was to >> start documenting the issues that arise when working with >> lemon-ontolex to model terminologies. Patricia enlisted some >> of them here: >> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Terminology#Open_Issues, >> they will be filled with more details before the next >> meeting. Also, any other member with experience in modelling >> terminologies in lemon, feel free to document your own issues >> using the same template. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jorge >> >> -- >> Jorge Gracia, PhD >> Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering / >> Aragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A) >> University of Zaragoza >> http://jogracia.url.ph/web/ >> > -- > Thierry Declerck > Senior Consultant at DFKI GmbH, Multilinguality and Language Technology > Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 3 > D-66123 Saarbruecken > Phone: +49 681 / 857 75-53 58 > Fax: +49 681 / 857 75-53 38 > email:declerck@dfki.de > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH > Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany > > Geschäftsführung: > Prof. Dr. Antonio Krüger (Vorsitzender) > Helmut Ditzer > > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Dr. Ferri Abolhassan > Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 > ------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Thierry Declerck Senior Consultant at DFKI GmbH, Multilinguality and Language Technology Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 3 D-66123 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 681 / 857 75-53 58 Fax: +49 681 / 857 75-53 38 email:declerck@dfki.de ------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Antonio Krüger (Vorsitzender) Helmut Ditzer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Dr. Ferri Abolhassan Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 -------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2023 11:55:56 UTC