- From: Thierry Declerck <declerck@dfki.de>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 20:59:49 +0200
- To: Fahad Khan <fahad.khan@ilc.cnr.it>, Jorge Gracia del Río <jogracia@unizar.es>
- Cc: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <523e3e3b-2282-bc28-5133-e02b19825a91@dfki.de>
Hi Fahad, All, Thanks for the mail! From me just a "terminological" comment. The ISO work is on "representing" the core of TBX in RDF, but not on"serializing" TBX in RDF (as RDF is a modeling language). I think that we have to be careful here (and the ISO committee, the link you are pointing to) is using the right term (Representation). Besides this, I think that an Ontolex-driven representation of terminology data should go beyond the "mere" reproduction of TBX and should make full use of RDF-based modeling. Some of the points Patricia mentioned in the document refered to by Jorge are related to this point. Well just some thoughts. Cheers Thierry Am 19.06.2023 um 19:29 schrieb Fahad Khan: > Dear All, > As I mentioned in the W3C Day preparation meeting today, I was in > Brussels last week for the annual ISO/TC 37 meeting where I became > aware of work being carried out within the aegis of the terminological > committee ISO/TC 37/SC 3 withthe aim of defining a serialisation of > TBX into RDF. <https://www.iso.org/standard/84361.html> Subsequently I > got into contact with Hanne Smaadahl, the chairperson of the > committee, who was extremely enthusiastic about the prospect of the > two groups coordinating their respective efforts in a case where > there was a very strong chance of overlap ( as I recall one important > use case for the new OntoLex module is the conversion of TBX datasets > into RDF). I think it would be worth discussing this at the next > terminology focused telco to try and understand what such > collaboration might look like, especially given the closed nature of > ISO standards, something which I guess is kind of anathema to > our community (though I also think it makes no sense to have two > rival RDF seralisations of TBX floating around). > Cheers > Fahad > > Il giorno lun 19 giu 2023 alle ore 19:10 Jorge Gracia del Río > <jogracia@unizar.es> ha scritto: > > Dear W3C ontolex members, > > As you know, we recently started a discussion on a potential > Terminology module for Ontolex. Our previous telco took place on > 10th May, and it's time to schedule a new one. Please, those > interested in participating fill in this doodle poll with some > options in the first two weeks of July by the end of this week: > https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/dwr0RRzb > > As a reminder, the main decision from the last telco was to start > documenting the issues that arise when working with lemon-ontolex > to model terminologies. Patricia enlisted some of them here: > https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Terminology#Open_Issues, > they will be filled with more details before the next meeting. > Also, any other member with experience in modelling terminologies > in lemon, feel free to document your own issues using the same > template. > > Best regards, > > Jorge > > -- > Jorge Gracia, PhD > Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering / > Aragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A) > University of Zaragoza > http://jogracia.url.ph/web/ > -- Thierry Declerck Senior Consultant at DFKI GmbH, Multilinguality and Language Technology Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 3 D-66123 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 681 / 857 75-53 58 Fax: +49 681 / 857 75-53 38 email:declerck@dfki.de ------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Antonio Krüger (Vorsitzender) Helmut Ditzer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Dr. Ferri Abolhassan Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 -------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 19 June 2023 19:00:03 UTC