Re: OntoLex@Wikipedia

Hi Christian,

Here are some good links:

A couple of books that reference the model:
https://books.google.at/books?id=ej5qDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA155&lpg=PA155&dq=%22ontolex+lemon%22&source=bl&ots=uxVR-dcazZ&sig=ACfU3U10WV53UlTR1lLBJp0tIGGsQoCxpw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjbwJrfz6rmAhWdURUIHbqPBTM4ChDoATAIegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=%22ontolex%20lemon%22&f=false
https://books.google.at/books?id=ahWZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA2&lpg=PA2&dq=%22ontolex+lemon%22&source=bl&ots=gN4uqWlFW1&sig=ACfU3U2m5izzYu6uo7G4qMbTr584iJEFAw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjR7uHmz6rmAhU6XRUIHQBgByc4FBDoATAIegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=%22ontolex%20lemon%22&f=false

Press releases:
https://www.clarin.eu/blog/clarin-it-presents-lexo-where-lexicography-meets-semantic-web
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/lexidma/charter.php
http://aims.fao.org/activity/blog/version-402-vocbench-was-released-august-2018

European Technical Specification:
https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/isa/files/pmki.wp2_.d2.3_v1.0.pdf

Regards,
John

On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 21:39, Christian Chiarcos <christian.chiarcos@web.de>
wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> has been reviewed, no complaints about spam or copyright anymore, just
> about relevance, hence rejected. Summary:
>
> This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS>. *Reliable* sources are
> required so that information can be verified
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:V>. If you need help with
> referencing, please see Referencing for beginners
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REFB> and Citing sources
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources>.
> This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a
> Wikipedia article <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability>—that
> is, they do not show *significant* coverage (not just passing mentions)
> about the subject in *published*, *reliable*
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources>,
> *secondary*
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary> sources
> that are *independent
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_independent_sources>*
>  of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting
> these criteria should be added (see technical help
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference>
>  and learn about mistakes to avoid
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_sourcing_mistakes_(notability)>
>  when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the
> subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
>  The comment the reviewer left was:
> Are there some news articles that suggest this is notable beyond W3C?
> I guess we can work that out more easily than the earlier complaints. Not
> exactly wrt. "news articles" in any strict sense of the word, but with
> respect to coverage in scientific communication. @Everyone: Please add your
> favorite papers (own or other) on OntoLex to the draft page (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chiarcos/OntoLex). I guess everybody
> can edit this.
>
> Wrt. news articles: Have there been any press releases on Pret-a-LLOD,
> Nexus Linguarum or other projects that mention OntoLex? This would be the
> closest thing to a "news article" I can think of.
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> Am .12.2019, 02:18 Uhr, schrieb Christian Chiarcos <
> christian.chiarcos@web.de>:
>
> Am .12.2019, 21:13 Uhr, schrieb Manuel Fiorelli <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com
> >:
>
> Dear Christian
>
> When I tried to access the article, Wikipedia told that it was deleted
> recently.
>
>
> G11 ("spam"): We had that problem with creating a LLOD page, as well. But
> back then, we got a discussion, at least.
> G12 ("copyright"): The copyright infringement pertains to the OntoLex-core
> diagram. I put in the file documentation that this is a trivial
> visualization of commonly available information (it is a conventional class
> diagram, in the end), and used the corresponding tag but that wasn't
> convincing, it seems.
>
> A revision without details on the W3C CG, without the diagram and without
> any quotes now under  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chiarcos/OntoLex.
> Submitted for revision by a Wikipedia editor. May take 4 months, but can be
> edited until then.
>
> I guess it would help if people express the need for such a page:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
>
> Looking at the message reporting on the deletion, I understood that it was
> motives by a combination of two issues: promotional nature of the article
> and inclusion of copyrighted work.
>
> Not sure what we should do to solve the problem.
>
> Regards
> Manuel
>
>
> Il ven 6 dic 2019, 19:56 Christian Chiarcos <christian.chiarcos@web.de>
> ha scritto:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I just created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OntoLex. Please check and
>> improve!
>>
>> BTW: Copyright of the OntoLex-Lemon core diagram seems to be restricted.
>> Please
>> confirm.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Christian
>> --
>> Christian Chiarcos
>> Applied Computational Linguistics
>> Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt a. M.
>> 60054 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
>>
>> office: Robert-Mayer-Str. 10, #401b
>> mail: chiarcos@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
>> web: http://acoli.cs.uni-frankfurt.de
>> tel: +49-(0)69-798-22463
>> fax: +49-(0)69-798-28931
>>
>
> Am Fr., 6. Dez. 2019 um 21:13 Uhr schrieb Manuel Fiorelli <
> manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear Christian
>>
>> When I tried to access the article, Wikipedia told that it was deleted
>> recently.
>>
>> Looking at the message reporting on the deletion, I understood that it
>> was motives by a combination of two issues: promotional nature of the
>> article and inclusion of copyrighted work.
>>
>> Not sure what we should do to solve the problem.
>>
>> Regards
>> Manuel
>>
>>
>> Il ven 6 dic 2019, 19:56 Christian Chiarcos <christian.chiarcos@web.de>
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I just created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OntoLex. Please check and
>>> improve!
>>>
>>> BTW: Copyright of the OntoLex-Lemon core diagram seems to be restricted.
>>> Please
>>> confirm.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Christian
>>> --
>>> Christian Chiarcos
>>> Applied Computational Linguistics
>>> Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt a. M.
>>> 60054 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
>>>
>>> office: Robert-Mayer-Str. 10, #401b
>>> mail: chiarcos@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
>>> web: http://acoli.cs.uni-frankfurt.de
>>> tel: +49-(0)69-798-22463
>>> fax: +49-(0)69-798-28931
>>>
>>
>
>
>