- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:32:56 +0200
- To: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <53BD1A58.803@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Dear all, I am working through the synsem module, see my updates on the GIT repository. I do not have major changes of this module other than the following two: 1) I have changed a number of definitions to make them clearer, please check and let me know if the definitions are fine. 2) For the sake of symmetry, I propose to add a class "SemanticFrame" as a counterpart to Frame, which represents a syntactic frame, essentially capturing the valence or subcat behaviour of a given lexical entry. This SemanticFrame would essentially be a subclass of LexicalSense, and would leave the other parts of the model essentially untouched. I feel that having this symmetry (syntactic and semantic side) makes the model more elegant and clearer. Some people will be looking for something like this. Essentially, a SemanticFrame would represent a gestalt-like conceptual construction that represents the meaning of a lexical entry. I have chosen the following definition for the "SemanticFrame" class: A Semantic Frame is a coherent structure of related concepts that are related such that without knowledge of all of them, one does not have complete knowledge of any one; they are in that sense types of gestalt. The coherent structure is represented by one or more predicates from a given ontology. Please check the ontology, the examples etc. and help me to debug the ontology, description and examples. Best regards, Philipp. -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano Phone: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 12412 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS) Raum 2.307 Universität Bielefeld Inspiration 1 33619 Bielefeld
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 10:33:25 UTC