doubt about "Synset / Concept" class

Dear Philipp, all

I am not able to join the telco today, sorry. But let me to formulate
a quick question about John's model
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/File:John-modelling.png);
maybe you can treat it today.
Following the previous discussions I can understand the inclusion of
the new class "Synset / Concept". My doubt is: despite the fact that
skos concepts could be represented with this new class, can we
alternatively continuing treating skos concepts (of external skos
ontologies) as "ontology entities"? (as in the IFLA example presented
last week). For me this option is very natural, fully compliant with
R3 "semantics by reference" and we shouldn't lose it.

Best regards,
Jorge


2013/5/2 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>:
> Dear all,
>
>  this is a gentle reminder that we will have our regular ontolex telco
> tomorrow.
>
> I intend to discuss the model proposed by John on the basis of the
> contributions of all of you.
> I would like to see if there is a chance that we agree on this model as a
> building block for the further work.
>
> Here is a link to the conference metadata including access details:
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2013.03.05,_15-16_pm_CET
>
> Best regards,
>
> Philipp.
>
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> Semantic Computing Group
> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> University of Bielefeld
>
> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Room H-127
> Morgenbreede 39
> 33615 Bielefeld
>
>



--
Jorge Gracia, PhD
Ontology Engineering Group
Artificial Intelligence Department
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/

Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 12:59:08 UTC